Delhi High Court Upholds 'Right to be Forgotten': Balancing Digital Transparency and Personal Privacy
GS2
The Delhi High Court has ordered the removal of a judgment involving an acquitted individual, reinforcing the 'Right to be Forgotten' as a facet of Article 21. This decision highlights the judiciary's effort to protect citizens from the lifelong social stigma of past legal proceedings in the digital era.
The Delhi High Court recently delivered a landmark ruling by directing search engines and legal databases to remove a judgment concerning an individual who had been acquitted of criminal charges. By invoking the 'Right to be Forgotten' (RTBF), the court underscored that the right to privacy, as enshrined under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, includes the inherent right of an individual to move on from past legal entanglements that no longer hold legal relevance but continue to cause social stigma.
The petitioner argued that despite being acquitted, the online availability of the trial court's judgment acted as a barrier to professional opportunities and social integration. The High Court observed that in the digital age, information is permanent, and the "digital trail" of a criminal case—even one ending in acquittal—can lead to a "civil death" for the individual. The court emphasized that while the principle of an 'Open Court' and the public's right to information are vital, they must be balanced against the individual's right to dignity and reputation.
Continue reading — free with login
JeetoBharat publishes daily UPSC current affairs mapped to the Mains syllabus. Log in to read full articles.
Log in to read full articleNo credit card required. Free registered users get unlimited access.
This article was curated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical facts from official sources.