JeetoBharat
All current affairs

Electoral Integrity and Institutional Accountability: Analyzing the Debate on Special Intensive Revision of Electoral Rolls

GS2GS4

Nationwide protests have erupted over alleged irregularities in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, sparking a broader debate on the transparency of Election Commission appointments and the sanctity of the democratic process.

The recent nationwide demonstrations led by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) and allied opposition groups highlight a growing friction between political stakeholders and the Election Commission of India (ECI). At the heart of the controversy is the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, a critical administrative exercise aimed at ensuring the accuracy of the voter base. Critics allege that systemic irregularities in this process threaten the integrity of the electoral process, which is the bedrock of Indian democracy. Beyond the immediate concerns regarding the SIR, the protests have reignited the discourse on the institutional independence of the ECI. The demand for greater transparency in the appointment of Election Commissioners reflects a broader concern regarding the 'separation of powers' and the need for a robust, non-partisan mechanism for selecting constitutional functionaries. In a parliamentary democracy, the ECI is tasked with the monumental responsibility of conducting free and fair elections; any perception of bias or lack of procedural rigor can undermine public trust in the entire governance framework.

Continue reading — free with login

JeetoBharat publishes daily UPSC current affairs mapped to the Mains syllabus. Log in to read full articles.

Log in to read full article

No credit card required. Free registered users get unlimited access.

This article was curated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical facts from official sources.