Ethical Dilemmas of Assisted Dying: UK Parliament Initiates Landmark Inquiry
GS4
The UK Parliament has launched a fresh inquiry into the ethics of assisted dying, weighing individual autonomy against the sanctity of life. This debate explores the limits of state interference in personal choices and the moral status of life in modern society.
The UK Parliament’s Health and Social Care Committee has launched a significant inquiry into the ethical and legal frameworks of assisted dying. This move reflects a growing global discourse on whether individuals suffering from terminal illnesses should have the legal right to end their lives with medical assistance. The inquiry seeks to balance the principle of individual autonomy—the right to self-determination—against the traditional doctrine of the 'sanctity of life,' which views life as inherently valuable and inviolable.
From a socio-political perspective, the debate centers on the limits of state interference. Proponents of assisted dying argue that a truly liberal state should respect an individual's choice over their own body, provided it does not harm others. This aligns with John Stuart Mill’s 'Harm Principle,' suggesting that the state’s paternalistic role should not override personal liberty in matters of terminal suffering. Conversely, opponents fear a 'slippery slope,' where vulnerable populations—such as the elderly or disabled—might feel pressured to end their lives to avoid being a burden, thereby undermining the state's duty to protect all citizens.
Continue reading — free with login
JeetoBharat publishes daily UPSC current affairs mapped to the Mains syllabus. Log in to read full articles.
Log in to read full articleNo credit card required. Free registered users get unlimited access.
This article was curated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical facts from official sources.