JeetoBharat
All current affairs

Federalism and Investigative Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Stays HC Order on CBI Consent

GS2

The Supreme Court has stayed a Karnataka High Court judgment regarding the withdrawal of state consent for a CBI probe. This case highlights the ongoing constitutional friction between state autonomy and central investigative powers under the DSPE Act.

The Supreme Court of India recently stayed a Karnataka High Court judgment that had quashed the state government's decision to withdraw its consent for a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe against Deputy Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar. This legal battle centers on the interpretation of Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) Act, 1946, which mandates that the CBI must obtain the consent of the state government to exercise its powers and jurisdiction within that state. The case traces back to the previous state administration's grant of sanction for a CBI investigation into allegations of disproportionate assets. However, the current state cabinet subsequently withdrew this consent, arguing that the initial grant was not in accordance with the law. While the High Court initially held that such a withdrawal could not be applied to ongoing investigations already sanctioned, the Supreme Court’s stay effectively pauses the CBI's proceedings for the time being, pending a deeper constitutional examination.

Continue reading — free with login

JeetoBharat publishes daily UPSC current affairs mapped to the Mains syllabus. Log in to read full articles.

Log in to read full article

No credit card required. Free registered users get unlimited access.

This article was curated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical facts from official sources.