JeetoBharat
All current affairs

Filial Responsibility and the Law: Bombay High Court on the Senior Citizens Act as a 'Conscience-Keeper'

GS4GS2GS1

The Bombay High Court emphasized that the legal obligation of children to maintain their parents is an ethical intervention necessitated by the decline of traditional family support systems. The court described the Senior Citizens Act as a 'conscience-keeper' that codifies the fundamental Indian value of reverence for the elderly.

The Bombay High Court recently delivered a significant observation regarding the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, describing the law as a 'conscience-keeper' for society. The court noted that while the obligation of children to care for their parents is deeply rooted in the Indian cultural and moral fabric, the increasing strain on traditional family structures has necessitated legal intervention. The court’s remarks highlight a critical intersection between law and ethics. In an ideal society, the care of the elderly would be a natural moral duty performed within the family. However, with the rise of nuclear families, urbanization, and changing socio-economic dynamics, instances of elder neglect have surged. By codifying filial responsibility, the Senior Citizens Act transforms a private moral obligation into a public legal duty. This ensures that the elderly are not left destitute and can live with dignity, which is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Continue reading — free with login

JeetoBharat publishes daily UPSC current affairs mapped to the Mains syllabus. Log in to read full articles.

Log in to read full article

No credit card required. Free registered users get unlimited access.

This article was curated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical facts from official sources.