Inherent Human Dignity: Supreme Court Reaffirms Prisoners' Right to Comprehensive Healthcare
GS2GS4
The Supreme Court has ruled that the 'Right to Health' is an inalienable facet of the 'Right to Life' under Article 21 for all prisoners. Invoking Kantian ethics, the Court emphasized that the state's duty to preserve life is absolute and transcends criminal status.
In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has reinforced that the 'Right to Health' is an essential component of the 'Right to Life' guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution, extending this protection to jail inmates. The Court observed that being a prisoner does not result in the forfeiture of fundamental human rights. It asserted that the state has a positive obligation to ensure that those in its custody have access to adequate medical facilities and comprehensive healthcare, regardless of the nature of their crimes.
A significant aspect of this ruling is the Court’s reliance on the Kantian philosophy of 'Human Dignity.' Immanuel Kant argued that human beings should always be treated as ends in themselves, never merely as a means to an end. By applying this to the penal system, the Court suggests that while the law may restrict a person's liberty as punishment, it cannot diminish their inherent worth as a human being. This shifts the focus from a purely retributive model of justice to one that respects the moral status of the individual, asserting that the state's moral obligation to preserve life must be absolute.
Continue reading — free with login
JeetoBharat publishes daily UPSC current affairs mapped to the Mains syllabus. Log in to read full articles.
Log in to read full articleNo credit card required. Free registered users get unlimited access.
This article was curated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical facts from official sources.