Judicial Intervention Against Electoral Malpractice: Curbing the Influence of Illicit Finance
GS2GS4
The Supreme Court has issued stringent directives to mitigate the influence of illicit money in elections, highlighting the threat posed by the nexus between crime and political power to democratic integrity.
The Supreme Court’s recent intervention regarding the role of illicit money in the electoral process marks a significant judicial effort to safeguard the sanctity of Indian democracy. By emphasizing that the infusion of unaccounted wealth creates an uneven playing field, the Court has underscored the systemic risks posed by the 'money-power' culture. This phenomenon not only distorts the level playing field essential for free and fair elections but also facilitates a dangerous nexus between criminal elements and political actors, which threatens the foundational values of the Constitution.
In the Indian context, the influence of money power often manifests through excessive campaign spending, the distribution of inducements, and the opaque nature of political funding. The Court’s directives aim to enhance transparency and accountability, ensuring that the electoral process remains a reflection of the popular will rather than a contest of financial resources. This judicial stance aligns with the broader objective of maintaining probity in public life, as the entry of illicit funds into the political ecosystem often leads to policy capture and the erosion of institutional trust.
Continue reading — free with login
JeetoBharat publishes daily UPSC current affairs mapped to the Mains syllabus. Log in to read full articles.
Log in to read full articleNo credit card required. Free registered users get unlimited access.
This article was curated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical facts from official sources.