Mainstreaming Alternative Dispute Resolution in Family Jurisprudence: A Judicial Perspective
GS2
The Supreme Court’s Committee for Family Court Matters is spearheading a regional conference in the Eastern Zone to evaluate the efficacy of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) over traditional litigation in resolving family conflicts.
The Supreme Court of India, through its Committee for Family Court Matters, has initiated a strategic regional conference in collaboration with the Gauhati High Court. This initiative focuses on the critical intersection of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms and formal adjudication within the context of family law. As the Indian judiciary grapples with a significant backlog of cases, the shift toward mediation, conciliation, and counseling in family disputes represents a paradigm shift in judicial administration.
Family disputes are inherently sensitive, often involving complex emotional dynamics that traditional adversarial litigation—characterized by rigid procedural codes and public hearings—is ill-equipped to handle. The conference aims to synthesize best practices for timely resolution, emphasizing that family matters require a restorative rather than a punitive approach. By promoting ADR, the judiciary seeks to reduce the psychological and financial burden on litigants, particularly women and children, who are often the most vulnerable stakeholders in matrimonial and custody-related litigation.
Continue reading — free with login
JeetoBharat publishes daily UPSC current affairs mapped to the Mains syllabus. Log in to read full articles.
Log in to read full articleNo credit card required. Free registered users get unlimited access.
This article was curated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical facts from official sources.