Model Code of Conduct and Public Broadcasters: Balancing Official Duty and Electoral Fairness
GS2
The use of state-owned media for high-level executive addresses during election periods has sparked a debate on the Model Code of Conduct. It raises critical questions regarding the interpretation of Article 324 and the prevention of corrupt practices under the Representation of the People Act, 1951.
The Model Code of Conduct (MCC) is a set of guidelines issued by the Election Commission of India (ECI) to regulate political parties and candidates during elections. A recurring controversy involves the use of public broadcasters, such as Doordarshan and All India Radio, for addresses by the Prime Minister. Critics argue that such broadcasts, when conducted after the announcement of elections, may violate the spirit of a 'level playing field' by utilizing state resources for partisan messaging.
The debate centers on Article 324 of the Constitution, which grants the ECI the power of superintendence, direction, and control of elections. Furthermore, Section 123(7) of the Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951, defines 'corrupt practices' to include the assistance of government servants for furthering the prospects of a candidate's election. While the Prime Minister is a political figure, they also hold a constitutional office. The challenge for the ECI lies in distinguishing between a 'national address' on matters of urgent public importance and 'political campaigning' disguised as official duty.
Continue reading — free with login
JeetoBharat publishes daily UPSC current affairs mapped to the Mains syllabus. Log in to read full articles.
Log in to read full articleNo credit card required. Free registered users get unlimited access.
This article was curated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical facts from official sources.