Reconciling Development and Rights: The Global Ethics Summit 2026
GS4
The 2026 Global Ethics Summit in New Delhi addressed the ethical conflict between utilitarian infrastructure goals and indigenous land rights. Philosophers proposed a pluralistic framework integrating Gandhian Trusteeship and Rawlsian justice to ensure inclusive development.
The 2026 Global Ethics Summit held in New Delhi has brought to the forefront a perennial dilemma in governance: the conflict between utilitarianism and deontology. Utilitarianism, famously championed by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, advocates for the 'greatest good for the greatest number.' In a developing economy like India, this philosophy often underpins large-scale infrastructure projects—such as dams, mines, and highways—that promise national growth but frequently necessitate the displacement of indigenous communities.
Opposing this is the deontological perspective, which asserts that certain rights, such as the land rights of indigenous peoples, are inherent and should not be violated regardless of the potential benefits to the majority. The summit highlighted that treating indigenous lands merely as 'resources' for the majority ignores the deep spiritual, cultural, and historical ties these communities have with their environment. To bridge this gap, philosophers at the summit proposed a 'Pluralistic Ethical Framework.'
Continue reading — free with login
JeetoBharat publishes daily UPSC current affairs mapped to the Mains syllabus. Log in to read full articles.
Log in to read full articleNo credit card required. Free registered users get unlimited access.
This article was curated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical facts from official sources.