Reforming Global Climate Finance: The Case for Grant-Based Mechanisms in Vulnerable Economies
GS3GS2
Experts are advocating for a shift from loan-based climate financing to grant-based models to better support climate-vulnerable nations in managing loss and damage.
The global climate finance architecture is currently facing intense scrutiny, with experts at a recent dialogue in Dhaka calling for a fundamental restructuring of how funds are channeled to climate-vulnerable nations. The core of the debate lies in the transition from debt-heavy, loan-based financing models to grant-based support, particularly for addressing 'loss and damage'—the irreversible impacts of climate change that go beyond the scope of adaptation.
For many developing nations, particularly in South Asia, the current climate finance landscape is paradoxical. Countries already grappling with the fiscal strain of frequent geophysical disasters—such as cyclones, floods, and sea-level rise—are often forced to take on loans to fund climate resilience projects. This exacerbates their debt-to-GDP ratios, effectively penalizing nations for the climate-induced disasters they did not cause. Experts argue that this model is fundamentally inequitable and fails to uphold the principle of 'Common But Differentiated Responsibilities' (CBDR) enshrined in international climate agreements.
Continue reading — free with login
JeetoBharat publishes daily UPSC current affairs mapped to the Mains syllabus. Log in to read full articles.
Log in to read full articleNo credit card required. Free registered users get unlimited access.
This article was curated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical facts from official sources.