Right to be Forgotten: Karnataka High Court Reaffirms Privacy in Sensitive Legal Proceedings
GS2
The Karnataka High Court has directed the masking of a woman's name in a judgment to protect her social reputation, reinforcing the 'Right to be Forgotten'. This decision highlights the evolving judicial stance on balancing public records with the fundamental right to privacy in the digital age.
The Karnataka High Court has taken a significant step in protecting individual privacy by directing its registry to mask the name of a woman involved in a sensitive legal matter. The court observed that while judgments are public documents, the permanent digital footprint of an individual’s involvement in sensitive proceedings can cause irreparable damage to their social standing and personal life. This ruling reaffirms the 'Right to be Forgotten' (RTBF) as an essential component of the right to privacy.
The RTBF allows individuals to request the removal of their personal data from internet searches and databases under specific circumstances. In India, while not yet explicitly codified as a standalone statutory right, the Supreme Court in the landmark K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) case recognized the right to privacy as an integral part of Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty). The RTBF is widely considered a subset of this constitutional guarantee, particularly in the context of data that is no longer necessary or relevant.
Continue reading — free with login
JeetoBharat publishes daily UPSC current affairs mapped to the Mains syllabus. Log in to read full articles.
Log in to read full articleNo credit card required. Free registered users get unlimited access.
This article was curated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical facts from official sources.