JeetoBharat
All current affairs

Supreme Court Limits ED’s Arrest Powers Post-Cognizance: Safeguarding Personal Liberty under PMLA

GS2GS3

The Supreme Court has ruled that the Enforcement Directorate cannot exercise its power of arrest under Section 19 of the PMLA once a Special Court takes cognizance of a complaint. This judgment reinforces judicial oversight and ensures that the agency must seek court permission for custody after the trial process begins.

In a significant judgment aimed at balancing the powers of investigative agencies with the fundamental right to personal liberty, the Supreme Court of India ruled that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) cannot arrest an accused under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, once a Special Court has taken cognizance of the complaint. The bench, comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan, clarified that after a Special Court takes cognizance, the agency’s power to arrest an accused—based on its own "reason to believe" they are guilty—comes to an end. Instead, if the ED requires the custody of the accused for further interrogation, it must apply to the Special Court. The court will then decide on the request after hearing the accused and providing reasons. This transition from agency-led arrest to court-mandated custody ensures that the judicial process remains supreme once a formal complaint is filed.

Continue reading — free with login

JeetoBharat publishes daily UPSC current affairs mapped to the Mains syllabus. Log in to read full articles — 5 free every day.

Log in to read full article

No credit card required. Free users get 5 articles/day.

This article was curated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical facts from official sources.

Supreme Court Limits ED’s Arrest Powers Post-Cognizance: Safeguarding Personal Liberty under PMLA | JeetoBharat