Supreme Court Strikes Down Gender Bias: Married Daughters Eligible for Compassionate Appointment
GS2
The Supreme Court has declared the exclusion of married daughters from compassionate appointment schemes as unconstitutional. This landmark ruling reinforces gender equality by challenging patriarchal stereotypes and upholding fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 15.
In a significant step toward gender justice, the Supreme Court of India has ruled that excluding married daughters from schemes for compassionate appointment is unconstitutional. Compassionate appointment is a social security measure intended to provide immediate financial assistance to the family of a government servant who dies in harness, by providing employment to a dependent. Historically, many state and central rules restricted this benefit to sons or unmarried daughters, assuming that a daughter ceases to be a dependent upon marriage.
The Court observed that such an exclusion is rooted in deep-seated gender stereotypes and patriarchal notions. It held that the marital status of a daughter cannot be a ground for disqualification if she is otherwise eligible and dependent on the deceased employee. The judgment emphasized that marriage does not sever the bond between a daughter and her parents, nor does it automatically terminate her status as a family member capable of providing support.
Continue reading — free with login
JeetoBharat publishes daily UPSC current affairs mapped to the Mains syllabus. Log in to read full articles — 5 free every day.
Log in to read full articleNo credit card required. Free users get 5 articles/day.
This article was curated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical facts from official sources.