Separation of Powers: Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Arms Exports to Israel

The Supreme Court of India recently dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that sought a legal mandate to halt the export of military equipment and arms to Israel. The petitioners argued that such exports violate India’s obligations under international law, specifically the Genocide Convention, in light of the ongoing conflict in Gaza. However, a Bench led by the Chief Justice of India refused to entertain the plea, citing the fundamental constitutional principle of the 'Separation of Powers.' The Court’s decision underscores that the conduct of foreign policy is an inherent executive function. Under the Indian Constitution, the Executive holds the exclusive mandate to manage diplomatic relations, enter into international treaties, and decide on sovereign trade agreements. The judiciary noted that directing the government to stop exports would essentially mean the Court is taking over the role of the Ministry of External Affairs. Such an intervention would overstep the boundaries of judicial review, which is generally restricted to checking the legality and constitutionality of state actions rather than dictating policy choices in the international arena.