Supreme Court Curbing Moral Policing: Reinforcing Personal Liberty and Police Accountability
GS4
The Supreme Court has issued landmark guidelines directing state police to refrain from the 'moral policing' of consenting adults. The ruling emphasizes that law enforcement must prioritize constitutional fundamental rights, such as privacy and liberty, over subjective moral standards.
The Supreme Court of India has recently issued a significant directive aimed at curbing the practice of 'moral policing' by law enforcement agencies. The court emphasized that the role of the police is to uphold the law, not to enforce the personal moral standards of individual officers upon consenting adults. This landmark intervention reinforces the constitutional guarantees of personal liberty and privacy under Article 21.
The court observed that law enforcement often oversteps its mandate by harassing individuals in public or private spaces based on subjective notions of 'decency' or 'morality.' Such actions, the court noted, are not only a violation of fundamental rights but also undermine the rule of law. The guidelines mandate that police officers must act strictly within the statutory powers granted to them and respect the autonomy of adults to make personal choices. The directive serves as a check against the arbitrary use of power that often targets vulnerable couples or individuals under the guise of maintaining social order.
Continue reading — free with login
JeetoBharat publishes daily UPSC current affairs mapped to the Mains syllabus. Log in to read full articles.
Log in to read full articleNo credit card required. Free registered users get unlimited access.
This article was curated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical facts from official sources.