Supreme Court Scrutinizes ED’s Arrest Powers: Balancing PMLA with Personal Liberty
GS2
The Supreme Court has questioned the Enforcement Directorate on the timing of arrests prior to elections, emphasizing that the power to arrest must be balanced against Article 21 and the democratic necessity of a level playing field.
The Supreme Court of India has recently raised significant constitutional questions regarding the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) exercise of arrest powers under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. During hearings involving high-profile political figures, the Court scrutinized the 'timing' of arrests made just before general elections, highlighting the tension between investigative powers and the fundamental right to personal liberty.
The core of the judicial observation lies in the distinction between the existence of a power and the necessity of its exercise. Under Section 19 of the PMLA, an officer can arrest an individual only if there is 'material in possession' and a 'reason to believe' that the person is guilty. The Court emphasized that special statutes like the PMLA do not override the constitutional safeguards provided under Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty). Furthermore, the bench noted that in a parliamentary democracy, maintaining a 'level playing field' during elections is essential, as free and fair elections are part of the Basic Structure of the Constitution.
Continue reading — free with login
JeetoBharat publishes daily UPSC current affairs mapped to the Mains syllabus. Log in to read full articles.
Log in to read full articleNo credit card required. Free registered users get unlimited access.
This article was curated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical facts from official sources.