Judicial Appointments and the Transparency Debate: Justice Ujjal Bhuyan’s Critique

In a significant critique of the prevailing judicial appointment process, Supreme Court Judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan has highlighted the growing opacity within the Collegium system. Justice Bhuyan argued that the current practice of withholding the specific reasons behind the recommendation or rejection of candidates for judicial office represents a regressive shift from established standards of institutional accountability. He cautioned that this lack of transparency creates systemic loopholes, potentially allowing for the appointment of unsuitable candidates and eroding public trust in the judiciary. The Collegium system, which governs the appointment and transfer of judges to the Supreme Court and High Courts, has long been a subject of intense debate in India. While the system was evolved by the judiciary through the 'Three Judges Cases' to ensure independence from executive interference, critics have frequently pointed to its lack of a formal, transparent mechanism. Justice Bhuyan’s remarks emphasize that independence should not come at the cost of accountability. By failing to provide a clear rationale for its decisions, the Collegium faces criticism regarding the subjectivity of its selection criteria and the absence of a structured, merit-based evaluation process.