Judicial Intervention Against Witch-Hunting: Upholding Constitutional Morality and Human Dignity
GS2GS1
The Supreme Court has reaffirmed a murder conviction linked to witch-hunting, denouncing the practice as a severe violation of constitutional morality and a direct challenge to the Rule of Law.
The Supreme Court’s recent affirmation of a life imprisonment sentence in a case involving witch-hunting serves as a stern judicial reminder of the persistent struggle between regressive social practices and the constitutional mandate of human dignity. By categorizing witch-hunting as a 'blot on the Constitution,' the apex court has underscored that irrational, superstitious beliefs cannot be permitted to override the fundamental rights of individuals, particularly the right to life and personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21.
In the Indian context, witch-hunting is often rooted in deep-seated patriarchal structures, social exclusion, and the exploitation of vulnerable populations, particularly women in rural and tribal belts. The Court’s observation highlights that such practices are not merely isolated criminal acts but are symptomatic of a failure in social consciousness that undermines the Rule of Law. When communities resort to extra-judicial violence based on superstition, they effectively challenge the state's monopoly on justice and the secular, rational framework of the Indian Constitution.
Continue reading — free with login
JeetoBharat publishes daily UPSC current affairs mapped to the Mains syllabus. Log in to read full articles.
Log in to read full articleNo credit card required. Free registered users get unlimited access.
This article was curated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, please verify critical facts from official sources.